Independence bar is not set too high, says FSA
The bar has not been set too high for independent financial advice, claims Peter Smith, head of investment policy at the Financial Services Authority (FSA).
The regulator published a series of retail distribution review (RDR) papers this week on independent and restricted advice, distributor-influenced funds and the treatment of legacy assets.
They reiterate that a firm claiming to offer independent advice must provide unbiased and unrestricted advice based on a comprehensive and fair analysis of the relevant market.
Independent advisers must consider a broad range of retail investment products, including structured products and unregulated collective investment schemes.
Asked by Money Marketing, Fundweb’s sister publication, if the bar for independence has been set too high, Smith said: “I do not think the bar is that high. There is a lot of pragmatism built into the requirements.” (article continues below)
Smith argues the independence requirements after the RDR are there to ensure advisers think about how best to service current and future clients.
Asked how many advisers are likely to stay independent after the RDR, Smith says: “For a large proportion of advisers, they see benefit in the term independent adviser, so they are starting down the route of wanting to be independent. Inevitably, there will be some firms for one reason or another that decide they wish to offer a restricted advice service. We do not know the exact numbers of that yet, that will become clearer as this year goes on.”
Simon Webster, managing director of Facts & Figures Financial Planners, says: “The bar for independence has not moved much. An IFA, by definition, is supposed to offer independent, whole of market advice.”
Have you looked at investment trusts more since RDR?