Aifa to fight £50m increase to FSCS claims limit

Chris Hannant
Aifa plans to lobby against the proposed increase in the annual limit on Financial Services Compensation Scheme claims paid by investment intermediaries from £100m to £150m.
The regulator published its consultation paper reviewing how the FSCS is funded today.
The FSA has dismissed calls for a product levy to be introduced and for changes to the different firms that make up FSCS classes.
It is proposing a £50m increase in the annual claims limit paid by investment advisers. Life and pensions advisers will continue to meet claims up to a £100m threshold, while fund managers will see their claims threshold reduce from £270m to £200m.
The regulator has also suggested the creation of a retail pool for firms under the Financial Conduct Authority which will have to meet claims where one class breaches its annual limit.
Aifa policy director Chris Hannant says the funding review was supposed to address the “onerous burden” FSCS levies have become for advisers and ensure the FSCS funding model is fair and more predictable.
He says: “It is unclear how these limited reforms will correct these issues and we are disappointed the FSA has not gone further in its review of the funding arrangements. Options such as pre-funding have seemingly been rejected without being subject to public consultation.
“We will be seeking to reverse the proposed increase in the threshold for the investment intermediation class which will be a further blow for advisers who are struggling under the cost of regulation.”
Hannant says it is clear over recent years some firms have been placed in an inappropriate class.
He adds: “This review does not seem to address this fundamental issue.”
To receive more relevant articles like this one, why not sign up to our briefings and breaking alerts by clicking here and Follow @fundweb
Most popular
Most commented
-
Close Brothers' Haines: Exploring the breadth of EIS opportunities
-
Philippa Gee: Are platforms doing enough on move to brilliant clean?
-
Multi-asset managers split on how to play gold
-
FE's Gleeson: The fear factor driving passive investing
-
FCA seeks to ban and fine non-exec £154k over conflicts of interest
Most emailed
Poll
Have you looked at investment trusts more since RDR?



Readers' comments (1)
Phil Netherwood | 26 Jul 2012 8:59 am
This is why police shouldn't police themselves, someone else should review & set the rules. Don't they realise how unsustainable this model is? If business is down in a recession yet levies keep on rising sooner or later the system will break & then who'll fund the FSCS?
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment