"Transparency for charges is of paramount importance"

  • Print
  • Comments (2)

Last week we saw Hargreaves Lansdown announce they will be charging a new fee for investors buying tracker funds on their platform.

The announcement has created a debate across the internet and has not been well received by retail investors - the charge is hitting smaller investors hardest.

However, the introduction of the charge and investors’ response raise two points which the industry needs to address.

Firstly, transparency of charges is of paramount importance. Hargreaves has muddied the water by taking an undisclosed trail commission from a fund group whilst simultaneously claiming the high ground by introducing a transparent platform fee.

Not surprisingly, their clients are confused about what and how they’re paying. This illustrates why the Financial Services Authority’s plans to overhaul the disclosure of platform remuneration is essential. Of course, it is up to the platform to set their own charges but in doing so they need to be as transparent as possible.

The second issue it has raised is the challenge the industry will face in introducing new charges in the run-up to RDR.

The response from investors over this charge has been understandable but it also demonstrates there is a lot of work to be done to educate investors on the different layers of costs incurred when investing, such as platform fees, adviser fees, broking charges as well as the layers of cost within funds themselves. Funds aren’t ‘free’.

As things stand, it is quite clear that the industry is a long way from being able to explain the total cost of investing to investors.

Fortunately, RDR is helping to move the industry in the right direction. Full disclosure of charges will reduce confusion. In turn, investors will have to realise that they will pay - indeed are already paying - for services, whether for advice or for a platform.

 

Adrian Lowcock is a senior investment adviser at Bestinvest.

  • Print
  • Comments (2)

Daily Email Updates

If you enjoyed this article, sign up to receive the latest breaking news and analysis for your industry from Fund Web.

The Money Marketing CPD Centre

Time spent reading about technical or regulatory issues can build your annual CPD hours. Log and plan your annual CPD for free with The Money Marketing CPD Centre.



Readers' comments (2)

  • Problem with all of this transparency is that, from what I can see, the message to the customer is "as a result of RDR, you will be paying more - but at least you'll know who you are paying it to and for what". That won't quite be true though because the customer won't know how much they are paying towards FOS, FSCS, MAS and FSA.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Total hypocrisy.

    Come on then Bestinvest, disclose how much commission you earn on funds.

    And your telephone dealing charge, £75!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say Edit my profile/screen name

You must sign in to make a comment

Fund Data



Poll

Following the Financial Services Consumer Panel’s damning report into fund charges what do you think the solution is?