Absolute return 'should have done better', says Thames River's Potter
The absolute return sector only managed to generate “miserable returns” during the final quarter of 2011, according to analysis by Thames River Multi-Capital.

Gary Potter
Using data from Lipper, the multi-manager specialist shows the average absolute return fund handed just 0.2% to investors over the fourth quarter of the year, making it the fifth worse performer of the IMA’s 36 sectors.
Gary Potter, co-head of the Thames River Multi-Capital team, says: “In a quarter that was generally not brilliant for returns and a year that was certainly not positive for equities, these funds ought to have done considerably better.
“You would expect them to underperform in strongly rising markets but the idea is that they hold up better when equities are struggling, which does not seem to have been the case during 2011.”
However, Potter also points out that the absolute return sector is still relatively young and populated with funds which have very different approaches to strategy, geography, positioning and investable universes. (article continues below)
Potter adds that none of the funds in the sector are “inherently incompetently run” in his team’s view, as 2011 was characterised by high levels of volatility and offered a difficult environment for even experienced asset managers.
Thames River Multi-Capital’s research shows the absolute return sector made an average loss of 2.4% in the third quarter of 2011 and posted a 1.2% fall for the entire year.
“After losing money in quarter three and for 2011 as a whole, we would like to see returns above cash at least from these funds to regenerate interest in what should be a very appealing sector in such volatile times,” Potter concludes.
To receive more relevant articles like this one, why not sign up to our briefings and breaking alerts by clicking here and Follow @fundweb








Readers' comments (1)
Glen McKeown | 1 Feb 2012 1:53 pm
Oh, come on Mr Potter, Absolute Return Funds are just another form of Witches Brew, using ingredients that have no proven track record, other than being easy to advertise.
Every year we have some sector that doesn't perform as anticipated, and then we have the excuses.
Every investment contains risk; we cannot predict the future; so stop telling silly stories about anticipatable returns that confuse "irrational" investors otherwise we will have to set Martin Wheatley on you.
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment