Seven days in the life of Castlestone

  • Print
  • Comments (3)

In the short space of a week, market rumblings about Castlestone Investment Management (IM) came to a head with a coordinated raid on Wednesday morning, led by the FSA and flanked by the City of London Police.

Castlestone IM first drew media attention at the beginning of June when the Central Bank of Ireland released a statement saying new subscriptions into the Aliquot Commodity, Aliquot Agriculture and Intelligent Portfolio (IQ) Asset Allocation funds had been suspended in the absence of paperwork that apparently relates to the EU’s new Ucits IV funds directive.

Eight days later these suspensions were lifted but investors and the press alike remain mystified as to the reasons behind them in the absence of any conclusive explanation from either party.

As the story of the FSA “visit” has gained traction, it is these suspensions which have been touted as the obvious cause for the investigation.

Quite why it would have taken the FSA over a month to organise an investigation, especially after the regulator was apparently satisfied with their findings, is a little confusing.

Last Friday, however, we informed Castlestone we would be running a story about what we perceived to be unusual leveraging techniques applied to Castlestone’s fund of funds, the Intelligent Portfolio.

Although this fund is able to invest in any funds it sees fit, four of the top five funds are Castlestone’s own in-house funds. Additionally, it appears to have sourced a large amount of money from an undisclosed source for the purposes of investing in its own funds.

The fund, based in the British Virgin Islands, does not list this as among its grounds for leveraging in its prospectus. After reading an excerpt from the prospectus, an analyst who works on British Virgin Island funds at Morningstar confirmed the fund should not be leveraging up for these purposes.

While the fund suspensions do require more information, it is the source of the leveraging that we think requires the real explanation. The fund’s 191.7% gross exposure indicates it has effectively borrowed a seven-figure sum for the purposes of investing in Castlestone funds that are not listed or traded on an exchange.

It is important to stress that no arrests have been made and, while there is an investigation underway, no proof that any wrongdoing has occurred behind the doors of 86 Duke of York Square. But investors still need some answers.

  • Print
  • Comments (3)

Daily Email Updates

If you enjoyed this article, sign up to receive the latest breaking news and analysis for your industry from Fund Web.

The Money Marketing CPD Centre

Time spent reading about technical or regulatory issues can build your annual CPD hours. Log and plan your annual CPD for free with The Money Marketing CPD Centre.



Readers' comments (3)

  • Dear Henry

    You are wrong when you say it does not list its own funds as being amongst its possible investments.

    You only have to read the first four lines of page one of the prospectus (the Investment Objective) to see that it invests by investing in:

    "...a diversified range of separately managed asset classes advised or managed by the Investment Manager."

    It is clearly a fettered fund of funds.

    Moreover, the extent of leveraging is stated in the prospectus on page 7:

    "The Fund’s leverage will not be in excess of 100% over its total net assets (measured at the time of incurrence)."

    I would have thought it was pretty obvious that the fund is designed to offer geared access to other Castlestone funds.

    I don't know if you have a copy of the whole prospectus or just an excerpt, either way it looks like very sloppy journalism, well below my expectations of Fund Strat.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The problem is the prospectus also says the fund will only leverage up to invest in securities. There is a legitimate debate as to whether a fund that is not listed or traded on an exchange can count as a security.

    See the comment from the Morningstar analyst in the following story: http://www.fundweb.co.uk/fund-strategy/issues/25th-july-2011/analyst-questions-castlestone-fund’s-leveraging/1035038.article

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I would stay away from this Fund House after all the news in the press !!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say Edit my profile/screen name

You must sign in to make a comment


Fund Data