S&P stands by UK 'AAA' rating

Standard & Poor’s has said the UK will keep its AAA rating despite the economy slipping into a double-dip recession.
The credit ratings agency reaffirmed the UK’s top rating as stable, adding that it expected the government to stick to its tight budget and for the economy to pick up in the second half of 2012.
S&P said in a statement that “monetary flexibility remains a key credit strength owing to British sterling’s role as a global reserve currency.”
“The stable outlook reflects our expectation that the UK government will implement the bulk of its fiscal consolidation programme and that the economy should recover in the remainder of 2012 and strengthen thereafter,” S&P added.
The news comes despite last week’s figures from the Office for National Statistics which showed the UK economy contracted by 0.7 per cent in the second quarter of 2012. The figures marked a third consecutive quarter of contraction for the UK economy.
However, S&P added the AAA rating could come under pressure should the government fail to put into practice its fiscal consolidation plan.
“We could lower the ratings if the pace and extent of fiscal consolidation slows beyond what we currently expect,” the ratings agency added.
To receive more relevant articles like this one, why not sign up to our briefings and breaking alerts by clicking here and Follow @fundweb
Most popular
-
Ex-BlackRock MD: US raid on Bitcoin exchange is ‘hysterical’ reaction
-
Transact tops The Platforum Q2 leaderboard
-
IMA's Godfrey: I want to move as quickly as possible on cost changes
-
IMA's Navdeep Sidhu: Regulators should avoid Ucits rule changes for change's sake
-
Pimco's Gross: Inflation dragons lurk in the cave of QE
Most commented
Most emailed
Poll
Have you looked at investment trusts more since RDR?



Readers' comments (1)
Jon Danzig | 30 Jul 2012 9:19 am
At a debate about the future of the UK, I asked government member, Jo Johnson, MP, brother of London Mayor Boris, if Britain could be a number one economy again. He said no, because the UK only has a population of around 60 million. This doesn't make sense to me, as Australia only has a population of around 23 million, and yet the IMF recently predicted that Australia would be the best performing major advanced economy in the world over the next two years. Why not the UK?
To see the YouTube video of my question and Mr Johnson's reply go to:
http://youtu.be/IpvOOqMd6Ww (55 seconds)
Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment