Categories:Investments

Tyrie seeks additional details on effects of 'Robin Hood' tax

  • Print
  • Comments (1)

Andrew Tyrie, chair of the Treasury select committee, has written to the Chancellor for further information on the impact the proposed financial transaction tax would have on UK tax revenues.

Andrew Tyrie

Andrew Tyrie

The European Commission’s proposal, announced in September, would see a 0.1% charge on stock and bond trading and 0.01% on derivatives contracts. The tax would come into effect in 2014 and the EC predicts it would raise £50 billion a year.

In October, Tyrie wrote to Chancellor George Osborne asking what impact the tax would have on UK tax take. In a response, Osborne said over half of the FTT’s revenue - around £26 billion - will come from the UK, adding that as activity moves away from the EU in response to the tax, the revenue of other business taxes could fall.

Last week, Tyrie wrote back to Osborne asking for figures which take this “behavioural response” to the FTT into account. He also wants to know what estimates the Treasury has made on the effect of an EU-only FTT on the volume of financial services activity in the UK and on UK firms that trade within the euro area.

Tyrie says: “It is crucial to establish whether the FTT would - taking all taxes into account - raise any revenue and if so, how much. On the basis of the information in the public domain so far, it is far from clear it would be a revenue raiser. Too many claims and counter-claims are being made about the FTT without the necessary supporting evidence.”

Osborne’s response to Tyrie’s initial letter says: “Overall, there is a risk that any short-term revenue gains from the FTT will be eroded in the longer term through the wider economic impacts of the tax and reductions in revenue as activity shifts away from the EU in response to the tax.”

The Investment Management Association has warned the tax will end up hitting savers.

The FTT is currently at the centre of a battle between France and German who want to see it introduced solely in the EU to help deal with the sovereign debt crisis, while the UK has said it will only back the tax if it is introduced globally.

 

  • Print
  • Comments (1)

Daily Email Updates

If you enjoyed this article, sign up to receive the latest breaking news and analysis for your industry from Fund Web.

The Money Marketing CPD Centre

Time spent reading about technical or regulatory issues can build your annual CPD hours. Log and plan your annual CPD for free with The Money Marketing CPD Centre.



Readers' comments (1)

  • The FTT does not tax a final product nor profits. It taxes and even stops business activity reducing economic activity.

    "the EC predicts it would raise £50 billion a year"...Sweden's exact same, short-lived FTT produced 3 percent of estimated revenue before all other revenue losses and saw implementation and collection costs alone out-run revenues.

    "£26 billion - will come from the UK"...Isn't that more than the profits of the entire UK financial sector? Sounds like individuals will be paying most of this tax right out of their accounts through lower investment yields, higher loan rates, and higher prices for products, services.

    "whether the FTT would - raise any revenue"...at a rate of 0.2pc, EU Commission's 1200 page Impact Assessment for FTT finds that Europe's annual GDP loss could be as high as 3.5pc or 430 billion euros removed annually from the European economy, and up to one million jobs lost. That's 430 billion euros that would not receive a multitude of other types of taxation at around 50 percent. That's 215 billion euros in lost revenue annually.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say Edit my profile/screen name

You must sign in to make a comment


Fund Data



Poll

Would inclusion on a 'dog' list cause you to sell a fund?